THE HEALTHCARE DYSTOPIA

Minister Schillaci seized the opportunity of the Ferragosto holiday to delight us with two new circulars which, read alongside the new 2023–2025 vaccination plan, foreshadow future developments.
In the vaccination plan, written at the dictation of the EU and the WHO, vaccines are described as articles of faith of a new religion, obligatory on account of their high ethical and social value. Through the vaccination register and its integration with the electronic health record (FSE), the profiling of the entire population is envisaged. To achieve the goal of vaccinating everyone, the vaccination plan provides for an extensive propaganda operation. Anyone who does not wish to be inoculated with one or more vaccines is described as hesitant. Hesitancy is attributed to ignorance or a lack of trust in the healthcare system. The hesitant, especially among doctors and healthcare workers, must be re-educated.
The approach, gentle for now, is confirmed by the two circulars.
The first finally abolishes mandatory home isolation for those testing positive on a PCR test. However, heedless of the fact that swabs are useless and have a very high rate of false positives, the scientists at the Ministry of Health continue to recommend safety measures to those who test “positive”, such as wearing face masks, which are just as useless and harmful as the swabs.
The other circular sets out the guidelines for implementing the new vaccination campaign. The ministry triumphantly informs us that a new Covid-19 vaccine will be released. It must have been approved, the naive will think. Far from it. The circular anticipates that approval by the EMA and AIFA is expected by late summer or early autumn and that the first doses will arrive starting from October.
It is worth pausing to reflect.
The minister already knows that the new vaccines will be approved. And the pharmaceutical companies know it too, having already started production without waiting for approval, so that the new medicine will be available just days after the approval that everyone takes for granted.
To what extent, one might ask, will they continue to abuse our patience and the credulity of the public?
Approval by the EMA and AIFA is a fig leaf, and at the ministry they do not even have the decency to wait until it is published to keep up the charade of a scientifically tested product. Such is the anxiety to commence sales of the new vaccines that the minister felt the need—on 14 August—to alert everyone so that the bureaucratic machinery would be ready. The recipients of the new product are the elderly, the so-called vulnerable, healthcare workers, and naturally pregnant women. Gone are the days when doctors categorically forbade pregnant women from taking any medication in order to protect the child in their womb.
Today, the new religion has taken hold. Those who die or remain chronically ill for life need not worry, as the Constitutional Court has assured us. If they survive, they will receive a paltry little pension, and if they die, their heirs can share the handsome spoils of compensation that can reach up to around 75,000 euros.
What is to be done?
It is essential never to undergo swab testing. The narrative rests entirely on PCR tests. If everyone stopped taking them, the game would be over.
Furthermore, all consents to the processing of data in the FSE must be revoked. This can be done via the website of one’s Region of residence.
Finally, let us stay away from public healthcare. It is a costly choice, but relying on a system whose declared purpose is to sell pharmaceuticals rather than care for people is risky. Leaving public healthcare does not require anything out of the ordinary. It is sufficient not to consult a GP or use public facilities. Over these past three years, we have learned to recognise real doctors and distinguish them from the servants of the regime.
Alessandro Fusillo